What we found
34 agents' websites, read one by one.
Between late September and the end of October 2026 we studied the current site of every real estate business we designed for: 34 agents, letting agents and property managers in the US, the UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Germany, Sweden, Mexico and South Africa. On 1 November 2026 we opened each homepage again as a phone. It is a small group, so these figures describe what we saw rather than the whole industry.
34 of 34had their own listing photos, aerials or films somewhere onlineFrom our review notes
14 of 34sites still used stock or stock-looking photos in key placesFrom our review notes
10 of 25homepages had no valuation or enquiry form on the pageMeasured on a phone, 1 Nov 2026
3.4 MBmedian homepage download on a phone25 homepages measured
The striking pattern was not quality but sameness. 21 of the 34 sites ran on a real estate platform template, the kind a network, a portal or a software provider gives every agent who signs up, so an independent agent in Georgia and an agency in Germany could share the same layout, the same search bar and the same stock house. Eleven were built around a listings search fed from the MLS or a property system. Ten carried a blog or news archive, some with more than a hundred posts.
The agents themselves had far more to show than their sites did. All 34 had real media of their own: 15 had drone or aerial footage of their area, and many had a YouTube or Facebook channel full of walk-through films. Homepages were heavy too: 7 of the 25 we measured downloaded more than 5 MB on a phone, mostly from big sliders and listing photos served at full size.
Method: our review notes describe each old site in writing, and we counted notes mentioning stock or generated images and platform templates. Phone checks opened each homepage once at 390 pixels wide; 5 sites blocked the check and are left out of the measured figures. See the full method.