What we found
Photographers' websites, measured on a phone.
We read the current site of every photographer and videographer we designed for between late September and October 2026: 38 businesses in the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, Ireland, Germany, the Netherlands and Nigeria. On 1 November 2026 we opened each homepage again as a phone. The group is small, so these are observations, not an industry average.
3.4 MBmedian homepage download on a phone, among the heaviest trades in our study31 homepages measured
18 of 31homepages were over 3 MB before the visitor had done anythingMeasured on a phone, 1 Nov 2026
19 of 31homepages had no enquiry or booking form on the page itselfMeasured on a phone, 1 Nov 2026
37 of 38had strong work of their own to build from, unsurprisinglyFrom our review notes
The work itself was consistently strong; in note after note our team wrote that the photographs were far better than the site around them. The sites were built on WordPress with page builders such as Elementor and Divi, on Squarespace, Pixieset, Showit, Zenfolio, Wix and several smaller builders, and a handful were hand-coded. The typical pattern was a dimmed slider at the top, a centred heading, then long grids of same-sized photos and a contact page at the end. 19 of 31 homepages had no tap-to-call link, which is fine for a wedding photographer who prefers email, as long as the enquiry is easy to find. The weight is the clearest gap: one in ten homepages downloaded more than 14.7 MB on a phone.
Method: our review notes describe each old site in writing. Phone checks opened each homepage once at 390 pixels wide, recorded the data downloaded and looked for forms, embedded booking tools and tap-to-call links. See the full method.